The GIS wizards at ITO World put the 369,629 US traffic fatalities between 2001 and 2010 on a single interactive map. We zoomed in on New Jersey, click on the key button to hide it. Note the clusters of blues (peds) and greens (cyclists) in the urbanized areas of the State. Thanks to the Guardian Datablog for broadcasting this amazing map.
View Larger Map
Saturday, November 26, 2011
Wednesday, November 23, 2011
Rutgers Releases New Jersey's 2011 Pedestrian Safety Tracking Report
Today the Bicycle and Pedestrian Resource Center of New Jersey released 2011 Pedestrian Safety Tracking Report. The primary purpose of the report is to track crashes and analyze patterns including hot spots where multiple crashes have taken place.
2011 New Jersey Pedestrian Safety Tracking Report Final
For a more detailed description of the report go to the New Jersey Walks and Bikes Blog.
Labels:
pedestrian,
Rutgers,
safety,
Voorhees Transportation Center
Friday, November 18, 2011
Are Fall leaves turning your bike commute into an unnecessary hazard?
| Rt 27 South near Carnegie Lake - Photo M. Hommer |
While this is a problem all across New Jersey, a good friend of mine often finds himself riding on New Jersey Route 27 just north of downtown Princeton. Every year he tells me that leaves and other yard waste completely block the relatively wide and useful shoulder. What makes this hazard of particular concern is that this section of Route 27 is also the on-road route of the East Coast Greenway.
Imagine if it was common practice to tell people to block a motor vehicle traffic lane with yard debris. It wouldn't be tolerated and neither should this practice as there are clear alternatives. In my town, residents are required to bag their leaves into large paper leaf bags. Even better, most home owners could compost their leaves on sight and use them to increase the organic mater content in your garden and flower beds. Brush and branches could be left on the grass off the shoulder and sidewalk.
More photos of the hazards on Rt 27 after the break
Tuesday, November 15, 2011
ADVOCACY ALERT: New Brunswick to discuss bicycle ordinance tomorrow
At the New Brunswick City Council meeting two weeks ago the Council decided to postpone their discussion of the proposed bicycle sidewalk ban ordinance till their next meeting which will be tomorrow November 16th at 6:30pm. At the November 2nd meeting photocopies of the ordinance were presented to all attendees (see photos below). As written, the draft ordinance would ban all cyclists from most city sidewalks regardless of age. There was some consideration to allow cyclists to use "multi-use sidewalks" on NJ Route 18 and on several other roadways. However in addition to the sidewalk ban, Section III, Paragraph B of the draft ordinance would ban cyclist from riding two abreast regardless if motor traffic is obstructed or not. This is part is most disturbing because New Jersey Statute 39:4-14.2. Keeping to right; exceptions; single file grants cyclists the right to "travel no more than two abreast when traffic is not impeded."
During the public comment period at the end of the November 2nd council meeting, I addressed my concerns with the ordinance as drafted and provided some historical background and the state of cycling in 1893 when the original city ordinance banning cycling on the sidewalks was written. From there I told the council that I was glad to see that the draft ordinance considered the needs of cyclists who use the sidewalks on Rt 18 and several other locations. I suggested that the sidewalk ban not apply to children under the age of 14 and that it should also NOT apply to to sidewalks that are on Rutgers University property that are also not immediately adjacent to city roadways (ie. in quads and on campus between other buildings). I did suggested to the council that a sidewalk bicycle ban was very appropriate, regardless of the age of the cyclist, in the central business district and in other select sections of the city that see constant pedestrian traffic day and night. However I felt that the sidewalk ban was totally unnecessary on most residential streets elsewhere in New Brunswick. I also addressed the issue of the draft ordinance's complete ban on riding two abreast which restricts the right to do so granted to cyclists in New Jersey Statute 39:4-14.2. I wondered aloud if the city could restrict a right granted by the state and let them know that my understanding was that they could not.
Finally, I asked the council to consider why cyclists feel the need to ride on the sidewalks in the city in the first place. Such behavior is typical when there is a dangerous on-street bicycling environment, or at least a perception that the street is a dangerous place to ride. I told the New Brunswick City Council that the best way to solve the problem of cyclists riding on the sidewalks was to provide cyclists a place to ride in the street. I was blunt to the Mayor and Council that New Brunswick was way behind peer university towns all across the nation that have done much, much more to accommodate cyclists.
In closing I told the Council that they could call on my expert opinion on this and other future bicycle issues in New Brunswick. I also reminded them that some of the worlds leading experts regarding bicycle and pedestrian issues are literally a stones throw away from City Hall at the Bloustein School, namely Prof. John Pucher and the staff at the New Jersey Bicycle and Pedestrian Resource Center which is part of the Voorhees Transportation Center.
Photos of the draft New Brunswick City Ordinance that would ban all cyclists from city sidewalks are below. Click on each and enlarged to read each page.
During the public comment period at the end of the November 2nd council meeting, I addressed my concerns with the ordinance as drafted and provided some historical background and the state of cycling in 1893 when the original city ordinance banning cycling on the sidewalks was written. From there I told the council that I was glad to see that the draft ordinance considered the needs of cyclists who use the sidewalks on Rt 18 and several other locations. I suggested that the sidewalk ban not apply to children under the age of 14 and that it should also NOT apply to to sidewalks that are on Rutgers University property that are also not immediately adjacent to city roadways (ie. in quads and on campus between other buildings). I did suggested to the council that a sidewalk bicycle ban was very appropriate, regardless of the age of the cyclist, in the central business district and in other select sections of the city that see constant pedestrian traffic day and night. However I felt that the sidewalk ban was totally unnecessary on most residential streets elsewhere in New Brunswick. I also addressed the issue of the draft ordinance's complete ban on riding two abreast which restricts the right to do so granted to cyclists in New Jersey Statute 39:4-14.2. I wondered aloud if the city could restrict a right granted by the state and let them know that my understanding was that they could not.
Finally, I asked the council to consider why cyclists feel the need to ride on the sidewalks in the city in the first place. Such behavior is typical when there is a dangerous on-street bicycling environment, or at least a perception that the street is a dangerous place to ride. I told the New Brunswick City Council that the best way to solve the problem of cyclists riding on the sidewalks was to provide cyclists a place to ride in the street. I was blunt to the Mayor and Council that New Brunswick was way behind peer university towns all across the nation that have done much, much more to accommodate cyclists.
In closing I told the Council that they could call on my expert opinion on this and other future bicycle issues in New Brunswick. I also reminded them that some of the worlds leading experts regarding bicycle and pedestrian issues are literally a stones throw away from City Hall at the Bloustein School, namely Prof. John Pucher and the staff at the New Jersey Bicycle and Pedestrian Resource Center which is part of the Voorhees Transportation Center.
Photos of the draft New Brunswick City Ordinance that would ban all cyclists from city sidewalks are below. Click on each and enlarged to read each page.
Friday, November 11, 2011
US Senate to Bicyclists - GET OFF THE ROAD!!!
Sign the League of American Bicyclists Petition!
Yesterday, I quickly put up a link to a Streetsblog DC article that gave a good rundown of the major aspects of the proposed US Senate transportation funding bill. While that article was good at giving a overall summary of this big piece of legislation, it did miss this small clause on page 226 of the Senate Bill:
Luckily, the hard working folks at the League of American Bicyclists didn't miss this egrigious little detail and fortunately for all of us, they are not going to take this lying down (HINT! This is a great example of why you need to join the League!). In his blog post (read it!), LAB President, Andy Clarke blasts this clause as "paternalistic," and a "pretty awful" precedent.
Well, you don't have to take this direct assault to your right to ride a bike on a public right-of-way lying down either! The LAB has put together a quick and easy petition that takes no more than a minute to fill out. As I write this over 2,100 have already signed this petition and about a hundred people have been signing it every hour.
Make you voice heard in the US Senate. Remind them that, "You ride and you vote!"
Yesterday, I quickly put up a link to a Streetsblog DC article that gave a good rundown of the major aspects of the proposed US Senate transportation funding bill. While that article was good at giving a overall summary of this big piece of legislation, it did miss this small clause on page 226 of the Senate Bill:
(d) BICYCLE SAFETY.—The Secretary of the appropriate Federal land management agency shall prohibit the use of bicycles on each federally owned road that has a speed limit of 30 miles per hour or greater and an adjacent paved path for use by bicycles within 100 yards of the road.No, your eyes aren't deceiving you. This is a mandatory sidepath law that forces bicyclists off federally owned roads (mostly in National Parks and Forests and military bases) and onto bicycle paths no matter how poorly the pathways are engineered.
Luckily, the hard working folks at the League of American Bicyclists didn't miss this egrigious little detail and fortunately for all of us, they are not going to take this lying down (HINT! This is a great example of why you need to join the League!). In his blog post (read it!), LAB President, Andy Clarke blasts this clause as "paternalistic," and a "pretty awful" precedent.
Well, you don't have to take this direct assault to your right to ride a bike on a public right-of-way lying down either! The LAB has put together a quick and easy petition that takes no more than a minute to fill out. As I write this over 2,100 have already signed this petition and about a hundred people have been signing it every hour.
Make you voice heard in the US Senate. Remind them that, "You ride and you vote!"
Senate forwards Transport Bill WITHOUT bike/ped funding
The following is written by Tanya Snyder at Streetsblog.DC and is reproduced here due to the importance and urgency of this issue and as she has done a MUCH better job summarizing the issue then I have the time to.
To continue reading this article follow the link to the complete story at Streetsblog.DC.
Also make sure you read Tanya Snyder's second look at the Senate Transportation Bill and why she thinks it's not as bad as it could have been. Also make sure you read the reaction by Rails-to-Trails' Kevin Mills to Tanya's second article (his is the second comment). He is not so optimistic.
The Senate Environment and Public Works Committee voted unanimously this morning to pass a two-year transportation reauthorization bill, moving the bill one step closer to passage by the full Senate.
Unlike in the House, where the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee has full responsibility for the transportation bill, the Senate splits jurisdiction among several committees, so the saga isn’t over yet by a long shot. The Senate Banking Committee still needs to consider the transit part of the bill, Commerce will get its hands dirty on the rail portion, and Finance is going to figure out how to pay for the whole thing.
Non-Motorized Transportation Takes a Hit
Rarely have bike and pedestrian safety been so squarely at the center of a Congressional boxing match as during the debate over this bill. The fight over dedicated funding for bike/ped projects – much of it focused on the Transportation Enhancements program – threatened the delicate bipartisan consensus for this bill. What emerged was a compromise that placated even the most hardened TE haters like Sens. James Inhofe and Tom Coburn.
To continue reading this article follow the link to the complete story at Streetsblog.DC.
Also make sure you read Tanya Snyder's second look at the Senate Transportation Bill and why she thinks it's not as bad as it could have been. Also make sure you read the reaction by Rails-to-Trails' Kevin Mills to Tanya's second article (his is the second comment). He is not so optimistic.
Thursday, November 10, 2011
STOLEN BIKE!! Maplewood - Brown Surley Crosscheck
The below comes from Tom Reingold, a leading force behind the South Orange Maplewood Bicycle Coalition. Help Tom get his bicycle back!
Stolen from my home in Maplewood at around 10:30pm on November 7, 2011.
CASH REWARD if you bring it back to me. CASH REWARD if you lead me to the person who had it or has it. This bike is not only valuable to me, it has a lot of sentimental value. I put a lot of handiwork into building it.
Brand: Surly
Model: Cross Check
Color: Brown, though it may be painted by the thief
Distinctive features: Unusually shaped mustache handlebars. Drum brake hubs (i.e. the brakes are in the wheel hubs; they don’t grab the rims). Silver fenders.
Email: tom@sombike.com
Phone: 973-821-3662
STOLEN BIKE
Stolen from my home in Maplewood at around 10:30pm on November 7, 2011.
CASH REWARD if you bring it back to me. CASH REWARD if you lead me to the person who had it or has it. This bike is not only valuable to me, it has a lot of sentimental value. I put a lot of handiwork into building it.
Brand: Surly
Model: Cross Check
Color: Brown, though it may be painted by the thief
Distinctive features: Unusually shaped mustache handlebars. Drum brake hubs (i.e. the brakes are in the wheel hubs; they don’t grab the rims). Silver fenders.
Email: tom@sombike.com
Phone: 973-821-3662
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)